Republican Investigated by Jan. 6 Panel Seeks to Join GOP Investigations Into Jan. 6, 2021

Republican Investigated by Jan. 6 Panel Seeks to Join GOP Investigations Into Jan. 6, 2021
Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.), joined by members of the House Freedom Caucus, speaks at a news conference on the infrastructure bill outside the Capitol Building in Washington, on Aug. 23, 2021. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
Joseph Lord
1/9/2023
Updated:
1/11/2023

A Republican lawmaker targeted by the now-defunct Jan. 6 Committee said on Jan. 8 that he was interested in joining a proposed probe of those same investigators.

The Jan. 6 panel, formed in 2021 under the guiding hand of then-Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), was almost entirely constituted of Democrats. Only two Republicans, Ranking Member Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) and Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.)—both vocal critics of President Donald Trump and the populist movement he brought into being—sat on the panel.

Over the course of nearly a dozen hearings, the panel attempted to prove its case that the breakdown of order at the Jan. 6, 2021, “Stop the Steal” rally was the culmination of a months-long plot by Trump and his allies to overthrow the U.S. government.

The panel, which ceased to exist at the end of the former Congress, left several crucial questions about the events of that day unanswered and unaddressed—questions Republicans have vowed to look into.
Now, Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.) has said that he’s interested in being a part of these investigations even though he’s under investigation for related events, the Pennsylvania Republican told ABC’s “This Week.”
In 2022, the Department of Justice (DOJ) seized Perry’s cellphone as part of their probe into the events of Jan. 6, 2021. Perry’s lawyers sued the DOJ and FBI for a return of the seized data but later withdrew the suit. The charges against Perry continue even as the DOJ and FBI face charges of “weaponization” from the new House majority.

In his appearance on ABC, Perry said that he doesn’t consider there to be any conflict of interest in his participating in Republicans’ Jan. 6, 2021, investigations.

“Why should I be limited just because someone has made an accusation? Everybody in America is innocent until proven guilty,” Perry said.

Pushed further by anchor George Stephanopoulos on whether this would entail a conflict of interest, Perry retorted: “So, should everybody in Congress that disagrees with somebody be barred from doing the oversight and investigative powers that Congress has? That’s our charge.

“And again, that’s appropriate for every single member regardless of what accusations that are being made.

“I get accused of all kinds of things every single day, as does every member that serves in the public eye. But that doesn’t stop you from doing your job. It is our duty and it is my duty.”

Republicans have several potential lines of inquiry to explore now that they’ve taken the gavel.

For instance, newly elected House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) and other House Republican leaders have promised an investigation into the role played by Pelosi and her appointees in leaving the Capitol unprepared ahead of the Jan. 6, 2021, rally. Evidence shows that on several occasions in the lead-up to the rally, then-Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund asked for National Guard assistance; on each occasion, the House Sergeant-at-Arms—a Pelosi appointee—demurred or refused the requests.

During the first round of Jan. 6 hearings, panel Chairman Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) made clear that Pelosi was off-limits for the investigation—Republicans, however, have made clear that they have no such compunctions against probing Pelosi’s role.

Another potential probe could be made into the FBI and DOJ’s handling of the investigation of the unknown assailant who placed pipe bombs in front of the Republican National Committee (RNC) and Democratic National Committee (DNC) headquarters on Jan. 5, 2021.

At one point, then-Vice President-elect Kamala Harris was even in the DNC building, placing her meters from the undetonated explosives.

Despite the apparent severity of the threat, FBI whistleblowers told House Judiciary Republicans that the FBI waited more than a year to mount a full-scale investigation.

Republicans could also investigate what role, if any, the FBI played in the events of that day.

Suspicion of the FBI ramped up among Republicans after Jill Sanborn, the executive assistant director for the national security branch of the FBI, refused to disavow agency involvement at the rally.

During a Jan. 11, 2022, Senate hearing, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) questioned Sanborn about potential FBI involvement. These questions were met with deflection by Sanborn, who avoided giving a definitive answer to the yes-or-no questions posed by Cruz.

In December 2021, Perry became one of a handful of GOP lawmakers to receive a request for documents and testimony from the panel, which had almost no Republican voices. Others called by the panel included Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and then-House Minority Leader McCarthy.

At the time, Perry refused the request, saying he would not aid an “illegitimate” panel.
“I stand with immense respect for our Constitution, the Rule of Law, and the Americans I represent who know that this entity is illegitimate, and not duly constituted under the rules of the US House of Representatives,” Perry said in a Twitter thread at the time.

Later, the DOJ also opened a probe into Perry.

The investigation of Perry centers around whether Perry committed criminal acts in assisting Trump’s efforts to throw out certain electoral slates amid allegations of voter fraud.

Ultimately, Perry’s committee assignments will be up to McCarthy, the new speaker of the House. It remains to be seen whether McCarthy will approve Perry’s aspiration to join the upcoming GOP Jan. 6, 2021, investigations.