Our Scientists Should Stop Colluding With Communist Regimes

Over centuries, scholars of antiquity and modern civilization have been intrigued by the search for natural truth and well-ordered rules for life.

Plato, they say, saw knowledge as virtue. Bacon, a father of the scientific revolution, saw it as power.

Ancient Greek philosophers achieved freedom by dedicating themselves to quiet contemplation. If they had been pushed into laboratories and obliged to publish their thoughts and findings they might have considered themselves enslaved.

Today, most scientists are Baconian. The search for truth has become more empirical. Scientists follow defined lines of research, publish their findings, and share conclusions with colleagues—including those from outside their own country.

Some say that learned men in Ancient Greece prized theory over practice because they feared the way a government might exploit practical know-how. Modern scientists might do well to be a little more suspicious of the state, even a presumably noble or democratic one.

Today, in one way or another, much of the funding for scientific research is supplied by the government. Even outside of totalitarian regimes, authorities who are paying the piper may expect to call the tune.

Wise scientists call for critical detachment from politics. Others have turned eagerly to activism and even espionage. The latter consider themselves part of a brave new global order in which scientists and like-minded intellectuals become lawmakers, mayors, governors, presidents, and world leaders.

For example, after switching sides to join the allied Western nations in World War II, the communist Soviet Union succeeded in collecting intelligence on the secret Anglo-American atomic bomb program that became the Manhattan Project.

Soviet agents recruited American and British spies who were committed communists, including several scientists at the Los Alamos laboratory.

Among the scientists and fellow travelers infatuated by Marxist ideology was Klaus Fuchs, a German-born physicist, who fled to England in 1933 and became a British citizen in 1942. Fuchs joined a group of British scientists who travelled to Los Alamos to work for the Manhattan Project, and he later passed important information about atomic weapons design to the Soviet Union.

After decrypted cables revealed Fuchs’ espionage, he confessed in early 1950 and was sentenced to 14 years in prison. His sentence was later reduced, and he was released in 1959.

The admission came in a letter from the principal deputy director of the NIH, Dr. Lawrence Tabak, who was responding to Congressman James Comer’s questions about a multi-million-dollar grant provided by the NIH’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) to EcoHealth Alliance, an NGO that supports various global health programs, and ironically enough, “pandemic prevention.”

The president of EcoHealth Alliance is Peter Daszak, a British scientist with a Ph.D. in parasitic infectious diseases from the University of East London. Daszak is now a member of the Center for Infection and Immunity at the Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health.

The director of the NIAID is Dr. Anthony Fauci, a celebrated American medical scientist who serves as chief medical adviser to President Joe Biden. Fauci is highly regarded by the regime media for his less-than-subtle criticism of President Donald Trump’s performance during the course of the pandemic.

The coronavirus-focused NIAID grant ultimately led to U.S. tax dollars funding EcoHealth Alliance’s longtime collaboration with a CCP-run lab, now believed by many experts to be the source of COVID-19.

Modern scientists have tended to place themselves above common people, whose tax dollars fund their research experiments and celebrity careers. Many have been attracted to socialism and utopian world visions.

Hayek also suggested that the intellectual class doesn’t only consist of professors, teachers, journalists, broadcasters, political activists, and entertainers. That class also includes professionals and technicians, such as scientists and doctors, who “through their habitual intercourse with the printed word become carriers of new ideas outside their own fields and who, because of their expert knowledge of their own subjects, are listened with respect on most others.”

Today, we learn about events and ideas through the medium of the “scientific community.”

It’s scientists and intellectuals who decide what information and opinions will reach us and how they'll be presented. Ordinary men and women are constantly admonished to “follow the science.”

From induced famines to slave labor camps, nuclear accidents, military occupations, economic incompetence, organ harvesting, and engineered disease, the Marxist ability to downplay cruelty and failure is one of totalitarianism’s most insidious weapons.

Filtered through left-wing propagandists, the weeping of dissidents from communist regimes is portrayed as uncalled-for and boring. The victims are regarded as already terminated.

We’re due for a wake-up call to Western scientists, tech professionals, and fellow-travelers. In the 20th century, we survived foreign domination by containing communism and allowing the Soviet Union to collapse under the weight of its own inherent contradictions.

The time has come to cut off the scientific, technical, and commercial oxygen we have been supplying to Beijing since the 1990s, and ask our scientists to join the side they’re on.