When historians assess Joe Biden's tenure in the Oval Office... ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ 
 
 

(Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

(Matthew Hatcher/AFP via Getty Images)

Mr. Tarrio and his cohorts were not allowed to probe very deeply or learn much about what could have been dozens of federal informants embedded in the Proud Boys on Jan. 6. One defense attorney said there were more than 50 “confidential human sources” spying on the group.

 

Much like the prosecution of nearly two dozen members of the Oath Keepers, the Proud Boys’ nearly four-month trial tilled potentially fertile ground for precedent-setting action by the U.S. Court of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court.

 

The backbone of the prosecution of the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers is the Civil War-era seditious conspiracy law.

 

Section 18 U.S. Code §2384 states that seditious conspiracy exists when two or more people “conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States…”

 

The federal statute might well be used against former President Trump in a superseding indictment to charges brought against him by DOJ Special Prosecutor Jack Smith.

 

Defending against seditious conspiracy in a D.C. federal court looks a bit like trying to nail Jell-O to the wall. Such a charge could pose a danger to President Trump in the overwhelmingly Democratic District of Columbia.

 

Another prominent felony charge used against the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers is obstruction of an official proceeding. The federal statute has never been employed in such a manner, and the controversy surrounding it has pushed one Jan. 6 case to the U.S. Supreme Court.

 
 

To dig deeper into the subject, read the following original reporting by our journalists:

 
 
 
 

Thank you for being a subscriber
If you enjoy what you’re reading, please consider forwarding this email to someone who might find it informative.
Your Feedback
What do you think of our pick for the top story this week?
We'd love to hear from you. You can email me at topstory@epochtimes.nyc.
We may feature an exerpt of your response in the next newsletter.

 

Copyright © 2023 The Epoch Times. All rights reserved.
The Epoch Times. 229 W. 28 St. Fl. 7 New York, NY 10001.
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to The Epoch Times email list.
Manage your email preferences here or unsubscribe here

mt